General
National Id
France_01
Site name
Lèze River Basin
Summary
The Lèze is a river located in the South of France, near the Pyrenees, on the French departments Ariège and Haute-Garonne. The case study concerns the implementation of floodbreaking hedges, which are located across the flood plain of the Lèze and are regularly spaced (every 300 to 500 metres). Partially obstructing the flow, such hedges can slow down running water and dissipate its energy. The project has been financed by the SMIVAL (20%), French State, local authorities, ERDF and the Water Agency (80% for all).
Light or indepth?
In-depth
The in-depth description of the case study
NUTS Code
Midi-Pyrénées
RBD code
FRF
Transboundary
0
Data provider
Guillaume MICHEL, ACTeon
Source(s)
NWRM(s) implemented in the case study
Longitude
1.362
Latitude
43.254
Site information
Climate zone
cool temperate moist
Mean rainfall
795,3
Mean rainfall unit
mm/year
Average temperature
13,1
Mean runoff
2
Mean runoff unit
600 - 750 mm
Average runoff coefficient
0,26
Type
Case Study Info
Monitoring maintenance
Monitoring impacts effects
0
Administrative annual costs
55000
Performance
Performance impact estimation method
Unknown
Performance impact estimation information
No performance evaluation
Design & implementations
Application scale
River Basin
Installation date
2009-03
Lifespan
7
Age
4
Performance timescale
5 - 10 years
Area (ha)
35000
Area subject to Land use change or Management/Practice change (ha)
1.3
Size
6000
Size unit
m
Design capacity unit
ha
Constraints
Presence of irrigation or drainage equipement
Peak flow rate
144
Public consultation
1
Contractural arrangements
1
Design contractual arrangement
Arrangement type | Responsibility | Role | Comments | Name |
---|---|---|---|---|
Organisational arrangement
|
Protocol for land policy
|
|||
Contractual agreement
|
The Framework agreement has been signed in August 2008 by the SMIVAL and its partners (French State, Adour-Garonne Water Agency, Regional council, General councils of Ariège and Haute-Garonne). This Framework agreement works for the implementation of all actions included in the PAPI for the period 2008-2016.
|
Framework agreement
|
Design consultation activity
Activity stage | Key issues | Name | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Public meetings
|
Several public meetings took place from 2009. They aimed at presenting the actions programme (including hedgerows) to the inhabitants. For each meeting, about 20 participants were presents. The SMIVAL also met inhabitants and local associatiations.
|
||
Meetings with farmers
|
Numerous meetings took place with farmers and landowners who may be concerned by planting floodbreaking hedges. The main issue was to explain implementation of this action and to define the associated land policy.
|
||
Consultation with local authorities
|
In 2009, local authorities (mayors) have been met in order to know about the implementation of the actions programme (including hedges) at the villages' level. Mayors also had the opportunity to express their expectations.
|
||
Consultation with technicals
|
The two local Chambers of agriculture are involved in defining the protocole regarding the land policy. Technical partners (for example deconcentrate technical state services and water related public agencies) have been consulted by the SMIVAL when actions of the PAPI have been presented and implemented.
|
||
Public inquiry
|
A public inquiry has been carried out in 2011. The response brief has been published in August 2011.
|
Design land use change
Land use change type |
---|
Design authority
Authority type | Role | Responsibility | Name | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lessons, risks, implications...
Key lessons
This case study shows the implementation of floodbreaking hedges across the flood plain of the Lèze, a river in the South of France. A land policy has been agreed with farmers and land owners for the implementation of the hedges as well as numerous participation activities.
Success factor(s)
Success factor type | Success factor role | Comments |
---|---|---|
Attitude of relevant stakeholders
|
main factor
|
An enabling factor for involving local stakeholders is the overlap of global issues and local events. For example, the involvement of farmers is higher when they see mudslides in their fields than when they hear about slowing down the peak flow. |
Financing
Financing type | Comments |
---|---|
National funds
|
For the period 2007-2011: 4 425 € from the French state.
|
Other
|
For the period 2007-2011: 8970 € from SMIVAL (self-financing; each member of the SMIVAL is involved in its financing).
|
Local funds
|
For the period 2007-2011: 1008 € from the General Council and 2144 € from the Regional Council.
|
EU-funds: Cohesion and regional development funds
|
For the period 2007-2011: 456 € from the ERDF programme.
|
Other
|
For the period 2007-2011: 5306 € from the Adour-Garonne Water Agency.
|
Driver
Driver type | Driver role | Comments |
---|
Financing share
Financing share type | Share | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|
Policy, general governance and design targets
Policy description
The main targeted problem is flood. Floodbreak hedgerows aim at slowing down flood peaks. Hedgerows are located across the flood plain, perpendicular to the river, and they are regularly spaced every 300 to 500 metres.
Part of wider plan
1
Policy target
Target purpose |
---|
Peak-flow reduction
|
Runoff control
|
Erosion Control
|
Policy pressure
Pressure directive | Relevant pressure |
---|
Policy area
Policy area type | Policy area focus | Name | Comments |
---|
Policy impact
Impact directive | Relevant impact |
---|
Policy wider plan
Wider plan type | Wider plan focus | Name | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Local
|
Water
|
PAPI de la Lèze : Programme d'Actions de prévention contre les inondations de la Lèze (Actions Programme for preventing floods of the Lèze river)
|
The PAPI is an action programme designed for fighting floods in the Lèze river bassin. Planting floodbreaking hedgerows is one of these actions. The PAPI has been approved by the French Ministry for Ecology, Sustainable Development and Territorial Planning.
|
Policy requirement directive
Requirement directive | Specification |
---|
Socio-economic
Costs land acquisition
5000
Costs land acquisition unit
€/ha
Costs land acquisition information
Four types of agreements with the SMIVAL were proposed to farmers and land owners. For one option, the SMIVAL had to buy the land from the owner. The price of land depends on the crop (arable lands or permanent grasslands) and on the département. In Ariège, prices are 5000 €/ha for arable land and 2500 €/ha for permanent meadows. In Haute-Garonne they reach 6000 €/ha and 3000 €/ha, respectively.
This option was never chosen by land owners.
This option was never chosen by land owners.
Costs total
75000
Costs total information
Financing comes from the French State, the SMIVAL, local authorities, ERDF and the Water Agency. Up to now, about 75 000 € have been spent for floodbreaks. About 20 % of the financing comes from the SMIVAL and 80 % from other financing partners.
Between 2009 and 2012, 3020 linear metres of hedgerows have been planted (including 520 linear metres for the two test hedgerows) for a total cost of 47 870 € (costs for hedgerows which have been planted later are not taken into account).
Costs are distributed as follow:
- Technical study: 9 240 € in 2007
- First test hedge (in Montaud): 4 221 € in 2008 and 3 532 € in 2009
- Second test hedge (in Artigat): 3 420 € in 2010
- Hedge planting 2011-2012: 27 456 € in 2011 and 2012
Cost of one linear metre of hedge : 11 € as planned by the PAPI. But for the test hedgerows, costs reached 45 to 60 € per linear metre.
Between 2009 and 2012, 3020 linear metres of hedgerows have been planted (including 520 linear metres for the two test hedgerows) for a total cost of 47 870 € (costs for hedgerows which have been planted later are not taken into account).
Costs are distributed as follow:
- Technical study: 9 240 € in 2007
- First test hedge (in Montaud): 4 221 € in 2008 and 3 532 € in 2009
- Second test hedge (in Artigat): 3 420 € in 2010
- Hedge planting 2011-2012: 27 456 € in 2011 and 2012
Cost of one linear metre of hedge : 11 € as planned by the PAPI. But for the test hedgerows, costs reached 45 to 60 € per linear metre.
Compensations annual information
Payment depends on the agreement between farmers/landowners and the SMIVAL. In some cases, there is no payment. There may be a payment to landowners when arable land is bought or rent by the SMIVAL. There may also be a payment to farmers when new hedgerows disturb the organisation of the farmer.
Compensations nr beneficiaries information
Landowners and/or farmers. There is no number available.
Compensations scheme information
Payment depends on the agreement between farmers/landowners and the SMIVAL. In some case, there are no payment. There may be a payment to landowners when arable land is bought or rent by the SMIVAL. There may also be a payment to farmer when new hedgerows disturb the organisation of the farmer.
Information on Ecosystem improved biodiversity
N/A info
Ecosystem provisioning services
1
Information on Ecosystem provisioning services
Provision of wood and food (fruit trees in the hedges).
Information on Ecosystem water supply
N/A info
Ecosystem impact climate regulation
Not relevant for the specific application
Biophysical impacts
Information on Peak flow rate reduction
According to a hydrological model: In the case where the flood plain of the Lèze would be covered by regularly spaced floodbreaking hedgerows, the peak flow of flood events could be reduced by 25% in comparison to the same river basin with field crops. In fact, the river basin already has hedges (about 900 km) and it will not be possible to achieve a landscape with a very dense network of hedges. The model only shows a trend.
Ecosystem erosion control
1
Information on Ecosystem erosion control
Slowing down water runoff should help to decrease soil erosion in the flooding plain.
Water quality overall improvements
Not relevant for this application
Information on Ecosystem erosion control impact
Local positive impacts on soil erosion can be seen, but there is no assessment nor quantification
Soil quality overall soil improvements
Not relevant for this application
Four options are available to farmers: agreement with the SMIVAL, servitude, renting and buying